Re: [Geotools-devel] Process API support for discovering requested outputs?

2012-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: >> The WPS spec supports requesting only specific outputs from processes which >> support multiple outputs.  Does the GT Process API support this capability? > > Nope, it does not. It could be yet another thing to be injected in the > ExecutionCo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Process API support for discovering requested outputs?

2012-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Martin Davis wrote: > [Posting this to the devel list as well, since it's more of a dev kind of > question] > > The WPS spec supports requesting only specific outputs from processes which > support multiple outputs.  Does the GT Process API support this capability?

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4177) gt-render test failure in 8.0RC1

2012-06-14 Thread Eric Engle (JIRA)
Eric Engl

[Geotools-devel] Process API support for discovering requested outputs?

2012-06-14 Thread Martin Davis
[Posting this to the devel list as well, since it's more of a dev kind of question] The WPS spec supports requesting only specific outputs from processes which support multiple outputs. Does the GT Process API support this capability? -- Martin Davis OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4176) Create PointStacker Rendering Transformation process

2012-06-14 Thread Martin Davis (JIRA)
Martin Da

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4173) Remove getViewTypes() call from GridCoverage2D.toString()

2012-06-14 Thread Daniele Romagnoli (JIRA)
Daniele R

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4175) Create Heatmap Rendering Transformation process

2012-06-14 Thread Martin Davis (JIRA)
Martin Da

Re: [Geotools-devel] API Change Proposal: ComplexFeature Parsing & Building Support

2012-06-14 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:25 AM, wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > Thank you for your response. I will try to add more explanatory notes to the > proposal when time permits. I considered making several smaller proposals but > decided against it as I didn't think the task lent itself to being broken up;