Re: [Geotools-devel] Repository difference? 9-SNAPSHOT vs 8-SNAPSHOT

On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 10:35 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 8 September 2012 04:15, Frank Gasdorf (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > Just to clarify what's going on: > > > > - it seems to me that prior 9-SNAPSHOT all deployments were done with > > maven versions < 3.x >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Repository difference? 9-SNAPSHOT vs 8-SNAPSHOT

On 8 September 2012 04:15, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > Just to clarify what's going on: > > - it seems to me that prior 9-SNAPSHOT all deployments were done with > maven versions < 3.x Hi, The issue was time-stamped artifacts with Maven 3 was discussed on the dev list a while ago. At that time Justi

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #85

See -- [...truncated 2456 lines...] at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:53) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeT

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-8.x-jdbc #32

See -- [...truncated 1171 lines...] Sep 7, 2012 6:12:26 PM org.geotools.jdbc.JDBCFeatureReader finalize WARNING: There is code leaving feature readers/iterators open, this is leaking statements an

Re: [Geotools-devel] Repository difference? 9-SNAPSHOT vs 8-SNAPSHOT

Just to clarify what's going on: - it seems to me that prior 9-SNAPSHOT all deployments were done with maven versions < 3.x - I had a look at the build logs from the osgeo hudson build machine: geotools 8-SNAPSHOT : maven 2.2.1 geotools 9-SNAPSHOT : maven 3.0.4 because maven dropped suppo

[Geotools-devel] geometry_columns for sql server as well

Hi, remember when we talked about the geometry metadata table for Oracle? Well, I'm now back with the same issue for SQL Server, which is aggravated by the fact that SQL Server seems not to have any native way to describe the srid and geometry type of a table. Any objection about adding the same

[Geotools-devel] Modelling complex features with simple contents in FeatureType

Hi, the CSW record contains a number of element looking like this: http://www.opengis.net/cat/csw/2.0.2"; xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows"; xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"; xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/";> urn:uuid:88247b56-4cbc-4df9-9860-db3f8042e357 http://pu

[Geotools-devel] How to build polygons properly in JTS from ArrayList>?

Hi, there, How to build polygons properly in JTS from ArrayList>? Can anyone help? Regards. David-- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape ha

[Geotools-devel] How to build polygons properly in JTS from ArrayList>?

Hi, there. How to build polygons properly by using simplefeatures from ArrayList>? Regards. David-- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape ha

Re: [Geotools-devel] Repository difference? 9-SNAPSHOT vs 8-SNAPSHOT

Try your geoscript copy dependencies with an empty local repo so it has to download the pom.xml files for geotools. On udig-devel frank had some details about differences in pom.xml between 8-SNAPSHOT and 9-SNAPSHOT. -- Jody Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Saturda

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master-jdbc #84

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Ex

Re: [Geotools-devel] Repository difference? 9-SNAPSHOT vs 8-SNAPSHOT

Sorry... what do you want me to try? On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Clearing my local ~/.m2/repository/org/geotools restores the problem :( > > Justin could you try this with your geoscript build? You can quickly push > geotools out of the way with a "mvn geotools geotools

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-4248 Support logging to SLF4J -> a quick consideration

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > My impression for the logging engines is that we were always marking the > dependency "as provided" (and thus not bloating). > If the implementation is available at runtime, GeoTools can be configured > to make use of it. > Ah, you have a po

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-4248 Support logging to SLF4J -> a quick consideration

Hi, i agree that splitting up may not be worth the effort in this case, although it is the nicest solution. Just noticed i have put the scope to "test" in my patch, that should have been "provided" of course. Cheers, Jan On 7/09/2012 2:29, Jody Garnett wrote: My impression for the logging engi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Repository difference? 9-SNAPSHOT vs 8-SNAPSHOT

Clearing my local ~/.m2/repository/org/geotools restores the problem :( Justin could you try this with your geoscript build? You can quickly push geotools out of the way with a "mvn geotools geotools2" Frank Gasdorf indicated on the email list that he had a "patch coming soon" but no idea what i