On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Jody, I see you are making pull requests which involve changes to the
> referencing module
> and merge them before getting any feedback from the maintainer (ah hem,
> me).
>
> Would it be possible to work on a branch so that you can reach you
> Jody, I see you are making pull requests which involve changes to the
> referencing module
> and merge them before getting any feedback from the maintainer (ah hem, me).
>
> Would it be possible to work on a branch so that you can reach your
> deliverable, and
> allow some time for the reviews
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Small update Andrea:
>
Jody, I see you are making pull requests which involve changes to the
referencing module
and merge them before getting any feedback from the maintainer (ah hem, me).
Would it be possible to work on a branch so that yo
My test case was bad, move along nothing to see here.
> - GEOT-4286 CRS.toSRS handling of urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326
>
(And thanks to jdeolive for the sanity check on IRC)
--
Don't let slow site performance ruin your busi
Okay I take that back, I had to mess with the GetMapRequest object.
- setBounds( String ) and setSRS( String ) remain straight forward
- setBounds( Envelope ) now looks up an srsName, compares that with what the
server thinks that srsName means and transform the envelope as required (sigh)
On t
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Let me check, I think they relented on that for the 2012 edition.
>
> Looks like wikipedia[1] thinks they did
>
> *Visual Studio Express 2012 for Windows Desktop*
> *Allows development of conventional Windows desktop applications in C#,
> VB.
Jody Garn
Let me check, I think they relented on that for the 2012 edition.
Looks like wikipedia[1] thinks they did
Visual Studio Express 2012 for Windows Desktop
Allows development of conventional Windows desktop applications in C#, VB.NET
and C++, targeting Windows client technologies such as Windows P
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Right. So, the story was that i wasn't able to figure out how to compile
> for windows 64 bit. I didn't want to buy vistual studio professional and i
> couldn't for the life of me get mingw-64 to work so i more or less gave up.
>
> Microsoft r
> Right. So, the story was that i wasn't able to figure out how to compile for
> windows 64 bit. I didn't want to buy vistual studio professional and i
> couldn't for the life of me get mingw-64 to work so i more or less gave up.
>
>
>
>
Microsoft relented on the visual studio thing in an ef
Hi Andrea,
Some comments inline.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, andrea antonello <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> I am trying to investigate enablement of spatialite support for uDig
> and am having some issues with sqlite's native libraries even before I
> get to the whole
Small update Andrea:
The request object and response object are escaping unmodified, so cascading
WMS is unchanged.
What is changing is:
1) The GetCapabilities Layer information (it now reflects what the server
provides, even if the global forceXY is on)
2) The Layer.getEnvelope( CoordinateRe
12 matches
Mail list logo
