Cool - thanks Jody.
Michael
On 15 December 2012 17:58, Jody Garnett wrote:
> uDig is stuck on the last milestone release until QA is finished (so perhaps
> after I return from Holidays?). Please upgrade to JTS 1.13 without us … and
> thanks for asking.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
--
uDig is stuck on the last milestone release until QA is finished (so perhaps
after I return from Holidays?). Please upgrade to JTS 1.13 without us … and
thanks for asking.
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 8:30 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Michae
Simone Gi
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Okay, I now changed the proposal to move everything to main that can be
> moved to main.
> Please have a look at the updated version.
>
> I hope we can get the needed +1's as soon as possible.
>
Works for me, +1
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Ou
Okay, I now changed the proposal to move everything to main that can be
moved to main.
Please have a look at the updated version.
I hope we can get the needed +1's as soon as possible.
Cheers
Niels
On 12/14/2012 09:37 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
Thanks Andrea.
> I'm a bit wary of merging on the stable series, maybe we should wait a bit
> and see how things go on master before a backport?
>
Yep - that sounds like the best way to go.
Michael
--
LogMeIn Rescue: An
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Hi Andrea, all,
>
> Martin has just released JTS version 1.13 and maven artifacts
> (binaries, sources and javadocs) have just landed at Central.
>
> I've managed to build GeoTools master against the new version with
> only one tiny chang
Hi Andrea, all,
Martin has just released JTS version 1.13 and maven artifacts
(binaries, sources and javadocs) have just landed at Central.
I've managed to build GeoTools master against the new version with
only one tiny change required in the render module. Details are in
this issue:
https://ji
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Jody wrote:
> Gabriel is removing GeoGit from master and folding it back into that
> project (he asked mark a couple weeks ago ).
>
Good point, and yet it's still not done, and besides that, the change would
end up breaking
the store that has been ported in geog
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Niels, that is a very good point. Andrea, there is a bunch of XSD stuff
> like substitution groups that are not represented in GeoAPI. It makes it
> quite tricky to break this dependency. Niels knows becaus
10 matches
Mail list logo
