Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Afternoon Brett: Please keep in mind that Java 7 is being discussed in terms of a build box profile. As of yet no build box configured for Java 7 has been asked for or volunteered. This discussion is in part to gauge interest in supporting Java 7. With that in mind here is the only thing I wou

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
In practice, no. While the bytecode versioning is well defined, runtime changes break compatibility. To take an example seen a few days ago, in Java 7 the FileChannel interface has a new interface SeekableByteChannel. Implementations of FileChannel compiled with Java 7 (even with target 6 as we

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Brett Walker
While I see the need to maintain Java 6 compatibility (build and run on Java 6), it should be Java 7 compatible also. I build and develop within both environments. I have successful builds on Windows 7 (x64) using Java JDK 7; so there is some definitely some support provided already. I underst

Re: [Geotools-devel] SLDStyleFactoryTest failure

2013-06-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Edward, I recall from an earlier email that you have a non UTF-8 locale: Java version: 1.6.0_45, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. Java home: /home/ejudge/Downloads/jdk1.6.0_45/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: ANSI_X3.4-1968 I think this is a synonym for ASCII. The problematic test con

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Phil Scadden
Point taken. I guess I had assumed 7 was fairly "safe" now. Our IT management certainly values deferred maintainance too :-) However, they can also get shirty about products that are dependent on no-longer supported software as well. You run into the situation where product A depends on version

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 11/06/13 05:36, Phil Scadden wrote: > On 11/06/2013 1:40 a.m., [email protected] wrote: >> Java 6 is put out to pasture? Not even an security updates... >> Q: Java 7 minimum? Terrible idea >> Q: Java 7 compile? Additional work to support both - discuss on mailing list > At risk of wadi

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Phil Scadden
On 11/06/2013 1:40 a.m., [email protected] wrote: > Java 6 is put out to pasture? Not even an security updates... > > Q: Java 7 minimum? Terrible idea > Q: Java 7 compile? Additional work to support both - discuss on mailing list > At risk of wading in where angels fear to tread, but is j

[Geotools-devel] SLDStyleFactoryTest failure

2013-06-10 Thread Edward Judge
I am seeing an failure when building the geotools code that looks like this: WARNING: Creating geom with null CoordinateReferenceSystem - did you mean to setCRS? Jun 7, 2013 11:19:24 AM org.geotools.renderer.style.FontCache loadFromUrl INFO: Bad file name in SLDStyleFactorynotExistingFont java.i

Re: [Geotools-devel] SLD and Internationalization

2013-06-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Catching up with this thread! > Checked it over, looks good. I may of missed it in the test cases, did you > support encoding on this one? > > It was pointed out in the Skype meeting that I need to be more clear :-D I was trying to ask if XML output can be generated from an InternationalStri

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10

2013-06-10 Thread Ben.Caradoc-Davies
GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-06-10 === Attending - Ben Caradoc-Davies Andrea Aime Jody Garnett Justin Deoliveira Alessio Fabiani Jukka Rahkonen Agenda -- - Update on Previous Action Items - GeoTools 9.3 / GeoServer 2.3.4 Release - WFS 1.0 C

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4483) Add support for graphics-margin vendor option for graphic fills as well

2013-06-10 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Andrea Ai

Re: [Geotools-devel] SLD and Internationalization

2013-06-10 Thread Mauro Bartolomeoli
> > This totally makes sense, thank you. > Hum... cpdetector is half a megabyte, a wee bit too large. > Yes, I know. > However, the xml declaration is just one line, and I believe that one can > be read before reading the actual content. > Actually, see this one, it seems a parser can read the e

[Geotools-devel] PSC/PMC meeting reminder

2013-06-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, here is the usual reminder about the meeting... sorry to be late, last Friday I was out... http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=GeoTools%2FGeoServer+meeting&iso=20130610T13&p1=1440 Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit http://geoser

Re: [Geotools-devel] SLD and Internationalization

2013-06-10 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli < [email protected]> wrote: > From my experience, it's not the parser duty to handle the encoding. This > is usually done building a Reader using this weird syntax: > > new InputStreamReader(, encoding) > > but this assumes you

Re: [Geotools-devel] SLD and Internationalization

2013-06-10 Thread Mauro Bartolomeoli
2013/6/9 Andrea Aime > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Created a pull request for this: >> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/202 >> >> Updated both gt-styling (in main) and gt-xsd-sld to support the new >> extension. >> >> Checked it over, looks good. I may of mis