Right, I ran into vecmath for uDig and wrote down some notes (under
technical dept) on the wiki. Here is the link:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Replace+Vecmath
I am sure that research is out of date, so I am interested what you dig
up...
To sum up previous conversation. We use vecmat
GeoGig is chugging along. Feature wise we're getting pretty close to a
1.0. Ben from Boundless Victoria will be running a workshop on the Monday
at FOSS4G demonstrating GeoGig if anyone wants to see it in action.
We've been taken under LocationTech's wing, so I've been working on an IP
review of o
Title: Message Title
Justin Deoliveira created an issue
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Yeah, nasty indeed. For now I was thinking of just leaving what is there
> for filter capabilities since it's valid with the new bbox type. And
> perhaps revisit when we come across such a situation. What I can do for now
> is at least
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Right, this also came up in a thread on geoserver users. The current
>>> design is by sponsor spec, but towards the end of the development I also
>>> would have liked to have so
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> We have several procedures that refer to the module matrix. I would like
> to rewrite those two sections. Creating a new module and supporting your
> module.
>
Oh ok. Works for me
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from t
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Right, this also came up in a thread on geoserver users. The current
>> design is by sponsor spec, but towards the end of the development I also
>> would have liked to have something more generic, where you would specify
>> a name and a
Thanks for the feedback Andrea. Comments below.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have been looking at the solr data store that was developed recently
>> and I have a mandate to make some modi
We have several procedures that refer to the module matrix. I would like to
rewrite those two sections. Creating a new module and supporting your
module.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:33 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> I have handed out a couple of
Title: Message Title
Jeroen Dries created an issue
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> I have handed out a couple of developer manual links that reference the
> now abandoned module matrix wiki pages.
>
> Serves two purposes:
>
> * point of call for unsupported modules
> * level of maturity used when evaluating modules for grad
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been looking at the solr data store that was developed recently and
> I have a mandate to make some modifications to it. Before proceeding I
> wanted to bounce the approach off of the group first.
>
> First change I
12 matches
Mail list logo