HI all,
the discussion kind of stopped here. Ben, are you satisfied with a more
relaxed approach
(like, case by case, or max % of reduction) to checking coverage in pull
requests?
Cheers
Andrea
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
Title: Message Title
Brad Hards created an issue
I am afraid repo.boundlessgeo.com (and many boundless websites) have been
unable this week. I think we will need to delay the release :(
I am afraid this is a website issue, not a network issue Andrea :(
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 September 2015 at 01:30, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I was setting up
Hi,
added the builds needed, but I experienced troubles with builds failing due
to OOM.
I could reproduce locally and the vertict is, we are just loading too many
classes to
run the tests with just 256MB of memory, pumped them up to 512.
Now the normal build of 2.8.x succeded, but it's having a re
Title: Message Title
Brad Hards created an issue
Title: Message Title
Brad Hards created an issue
Hi,
I was setting up to do the final releases, but it seems we are lacking all
the relevant
builds to be used for a release, to start with.
The release indeed requires to check if GeoServer has passed the CITE tests,
pick the GeoTools and GeoServer revision numbers from it, and cut the
release the
