Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

At least, there is C++ code in OGR: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/trunk/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/mitab/mitab_indfile.cpp Alvaro De: Jody Garnett Para: Peter Borissow CC: A Huarte ; Ian Turton ; Geotools-Devel list Enviado: Jueves 3 de diciembre de 2015 0:22 Asunto: Re: [Geotools-dev

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5319) Build failure in FileWrapperResourceTheoryTest.theoryAddingFileToDirectoryAddsResource on Windows

Title: Message Title Ben Caradoc-Davies [A

Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

Has to look up what off-heap memory storage is - looks to be using java.nio to access memory mapped channels (so access to memory managed by

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5318) GridCoverageRenderer fails on indexed image with null background color

Title: Message Title Devon Tucker created

Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

Hi Peter, great! it is a note very interesting for me !+1 Thanks a lot!  Alvaro De: Peter Borissow Para: Jody Garnett ; A Huarte CC: Ian Turton ; Geotools-Devel list Enviado: Miércoles 2 de diciembre de 2015 21:12 Asunto: Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-i

Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

Hi Jody, thanks for your review. about... "Alvaro I need to take some time with your proposal from a design perspective and make sure we are not making GeoTools unduly complicated. I do like the approach being taken, but we will need to document it for others." Sure, all comments are welcome. "A

Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

Regarding index "formats", one option to consider is MapDB. With it you can create *HUGE* hashmaps and other collections backed by disk or off-heap memory storage. I used it extensively a year ago to process OSM planet data. I believe the H2 guys were/are using it too. http://www.mapdb.org/ Ma

Re: [Geotools-devel] Online Tests quietly failing (again)

Torben, yes, in October I re-enabled skip.on.failure=false for active online tests because Andrea's fix solved the JNDI problem: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Online-tests-td5229255.html As you have noted on several occasions, skip.on.failure=false does not work as desired. I do not like

Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

Thanks Andrea / Alvaro for working through this. Alvaro I need to take some time with your proposal from a design perspective and make sure we are not making GeoTools unduly complicated. I do like the approach being taken, but we will need to document it for others. Aside: I am a bit sad that the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

Hi Andrea, I have changed the proposed pull applying your advices. Now, the shapefile module has not code about CDX-indexes. It is implemented in a new unsupported shapefile-cdx module. https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1056 Best regardsAlvaro De: Jody Garnett Para: Andrea Aime C

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2015-12-01

Regarding boundless repository state, I'd like to give all-clear signal. We missed the switch from http to https and in result download of serveral jars failed. Now, master and 1.5.x branch of uDig are fine again! Thanks Am 01.12.2015 23:42 schrieb "Justin Deoliveira" : > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015