[Geotools-devel] RangeCombiner.addRange compilation fix for Java 8

2015-12-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Andrea, Oracle Java 8 javac fails to compile RangeCombiner.addRange because it has started noticing that the two instances of in the parameter list might not be the same type: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/main/src/main/java/org/geotools/filter/visitor/RangeCo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira-release job fails

2015-12-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 22/12/15 02:21, Andrea Aime wrote: > If you have doubts other have made mistakes No, just a discussion of how to check in the context of a manual Jira release. I am happy for a release manager to check any fixVersions I set. I am just suggesting one way it might be done. > So yes, the commit

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira-release job fails

2015-12-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I see no tag for 2.7.5 in GitHub nor a call for artifact testing. Are you > sure this issue was omitted? In the release procedure, release in Jira is > the first step. If the steps were performed out of order and you are sure > 2.7.5 h

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-5329: Proposal to avoid Date-shifting due to Timezones

2015-12-21 Thread Peter Borissow
PostgreSQL has a several ways to store dates that might be problematic: - timestamp without time zone - date without a time of day. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-datetime.html Assuming we're limiting the scope to PostgreSQL with one of these column types: (a) +1 for removin

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-5329: Proposal to avoid Date-shifting due to Timezones

2015-12-21 Thread Andreas Watermeyer
Hi all, thank you very much for your response. I did some more research on this: Most important: I was wrong, dates can be time zoned: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#date. The XML spec for dates and times is inspired by ISO 8601. Both, the XML spec and ISO 8601 allow the time zone postfix "Z"

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira-release job fails

2015-12-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 22/12/15 00:21, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > wrote: >> Looks like there is already a GS 2.7.6 version (naughty, naughty, Jira >> makes is far too easy for an administrator to inadvertently add a >> version); someone has an issue for it: >> https://

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira-release job fails

2015-12-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Looks like there is already a GS 2.7.6 version (naughty, naughty, Jira > makes is far too easy for an administrator to inadvertently add a > version); someone has an issue for it: > https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7353 > Co

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira-release job fails

2015-12-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ian, yes, the Jira API changed when we moved from Codehaus and the Python script is broken. Not as smooth as your last releases in 2014. The undocumented manual procedure is to for each project: - Manually perform the release in Administration / Versions and release the version using the "..."

[Geotools-devel] Jira-release job fails

2015-12-21 Thread Ian Turton
It seems that both GeoTools and GeoServer's release-jira jobs fail (and have been failing for 9 and 6 months) - I assume this is related to the change of jira hosting, is there a new script or manual step that I need to run before hitting publish for the new releases? Cheers Ian -- Ian Turton