Re: [Geotools-devel] jdbc negative dates

Great! Thanks for letting me know Ben. Glad it’s fixed! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:41 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > The online build passed on ares and locally for me against postgis. > Thanks, Justin! > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > On 20/04/16 06:58, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > > Thanks, Justin,

Re: [Geotools-devel] jdbc negative dates

The online build passed on ares and locally for me against postgis. Thanks, Justin! Kind regards, Ben. On 20/04/16 06:58, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Thanks, Justin, I have kicked to online build to confirm. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > On 20/04/16 06:35, Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Should be fi

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-04-19

Good question. Andrew Hulbert had initially submitted the PR against master here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1128. In some sense, I'm looking for a backport of that PR for GeoTools and GeoServer. On 04/19/2016 04:30 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: That is for 14.x, does master need t

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-04-19

That is for 14.x, does master need the same update? -- Jody Garnett On 19 April 2016 at 13:29, Jim Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > The GeoTools PR for the Apache Collections update is here: > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1175. > > Cheers, > > Jim > > On 04/19/2016 04:19 PM, Ben Caradoc

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-04-19

Hi all, The GeoTools PR for the Apache Collections update is here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1175. Cheers, Jim On 04/19/2016 04:19 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-04-19 > === > > Attending > - > > Ben

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-04-19

GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-04-19 === Attending - Ben Caradoc-Davies Kevin Smith Jim Hughes Torben Barsballe Jody Garnett Dave Blasby Jukka Rahkonen Apologies - Brad Hards Andrea Aime Agenda -- - Release of 15-beta2 / 2.9-beta2 - W

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : geotools-master-online #472

See -- Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights in

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : geotools-master #1075

See -- Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into mult

Re: [Geotools-devel] jdbc negative dates

Thanks, Justin, I have kicked to online build to confirm. Kind regards, Ben. On 20/04/16 06:35, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Should be fixed now > > . > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM Justin Deoliveira > wrote

Re: [Geotools-devel] jdbc negative dates

Should be fixed now . On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I’ll take a look. > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:57 AM Andrea Aime > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> it seems this change broke the pos

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

Hi Mark, comments inline We've had to revert the upgrading of gt-wfs -> gt-wfs-ng due to the > naming convention change, we cache/store the namespace:typename of > featuretypes in our software and our things broke down all over the > place. Though documented, this really bit me in the ass, I expec

Re: [Geotools-devel] jdbc negative dates

I’ll take a look. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:57 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi guys, > it seems this change broke the postgis online tests build? > > > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/jenkins/view/geotools/job/geotools-master-online/470/ > > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/jenkins/view/geotools/job/geotoo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting rid of AbstractDataStore (how and when?)

It is too late in the release cycle, I would like to remove it at the start of the next release cycle. You are correct that DataUtilities has methods to cover the ArrayDataStore case. I actually put the class on notice in 2014 when the ContentDataStore workshop was finally available to help people

Re: [Geotools-devel] jdbc negative dates

Hi guys, it seems this change broke the postgis online tests build? http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/jenkins/view/geotools/job/geotools-master-online/470/ http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/jenkins/view/geotools/job/geotools-master-online/471/ Cheers Andrea On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Jody Garnett

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master-online #471

See Changes: [jody.garnett] log expected behaviour as fine and quite logs from system outs [jody.garnett] Log test name (rather than test result toString) when skipping gdal tests [jody.garnett] Fix headers/whitespa

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

On 19-04-16 00:32, Jody Garnett wrote: > I have been monitoring GEOT-5128 > looking to delete > AbstractDataStore and friends - currently in use by the gt-wfs module. > We have a "new" wfs-ng implementation based on ContentDataStore - that > is wai

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5405) Deadlock in ReferencingFactoryFinder

Title: Message Title Blaz Repnik created a

Re: [Geotools-devel] On-the-fly reprojection in ImageMosaic

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks for the brain dump Andrea (and to Devon for starting this > conversation). The key reason we are reaching out to geotools-devel is the > sheer wasted disk space represented by a static "gdal command line" > solution (which no doubt wo

[Geotools-devel] Getting rid of AbstractDataStore (how and when?)

Hi, I see Jody has AbstractDataStore in the crosshairs. The store is deprecated, so that one good thing, but I believe it's too late in the release cycle to just delete it. Looking at its usage, we still have a few unsupported stores using it, WFS (old), VPF, aggregating, edigeo, in case we just d

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I have been monitoring GEOT-5128 > looking to delete > AbstractDataStore and friends - currently in use by the gt-wfs module. We > have a "new" wfs-ng implementation based on ContentDataStor