Re: [Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer meeting at 15:30 UTC on Tuesday

2018-07-09 Thread Ian Turton
I'm afraid I'm training this afternoon so I won't be able to make it. Ian On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, 20:32 Ben Caradoc-Davies, wrote: > GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 15:30 UTC on Tuesday: > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=GeoTools+/+GeoServer+Meeting&ye

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+1. Thanks, Andrea. Kind regards, Ben. On 09/07/18 21:59, Andrea Aime wrote: Hi, I was looking at a Ian's pull request about supporting EPSG:404000 in image mosaics and it occurred to me that it makes the "imagecollection" module basically useless. The module has been out of the build for a lon

[Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer meeting at 15:30 UTC on Tuesday

2018-07-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 15:30 UTC on Tuesday: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=GeoTools+/+GeoServer+Meeting&year=2018&month=7&day=10&hour=15&min=30&sec=0&ah=1 -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread Ian Turton
+1 from me Ian On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 11:00, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I was looking at a Ian's pull request about supporting EPSG:404000 in > image mosaics > and it occurred to me that it makes the "imagecollection" module basically > useless. > The module has been out of the build for a long

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Andrea, no objections in removing geotiff_new and imagecollection (the only 2 I know somehow). +1 with removing the other modules you have mentioned, too. Cheers, Daniele On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > I would kill whateve

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread Simone Giannecchini
I would kill whatever is sitting there idle and/or without a maintainer. Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread bradh
Looking at the history, epsg-oracle hasn’t been getting a lot of attention. Brad From: Andrea Aime Sent: Monday, 9 July 2018 8:00 PM To: Geotools-Devel list Subject: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules Hi, I was looking at a Ian's pull request about supporting EPSG:4

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+1 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 058

[Geotools-devel] Cleaning up some community modules

2018-07-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I was looking at a Ian's pull request about supporting EPSG:404000 in image mosaics and it occurred to me that it makes the "imagecollection" module basically useless. The module has been out of the build for a long while in any case, so I guess time to remove it for good. Are there other modu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Setting up continous windows build on pull requests via AppVeyor

2018-07-09 Thread Ian Turton
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 09:39, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > during the weekend I was setting up a new Windows laptop and while I was > at it, I've checked > the state of the build on it. > Turned out a relatively simple fix made it build, so went ahead. > > Now, shall we keep it that way? I've tried

[Geotools-devel] Setting up continous windows build on pull requests via AppVeyor

2018-07-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, during the weekend I was setting up a new Windows laptop and while I was at it, I've checked the state of the build on it. Turned out a relatively simple fix made it build, so went ahead. Now, shall we keep it that way? I've tried setting up a build on Appveyor, was relatively easy and the bui