Tests in error:
testCropLevel2(org.geotools.gce.imagepyramid.ImagePyramidReaderTest)
testCropLevel3(org.geotools.gce.imagepyramid.ImagePyramidReaderTest)
Using Java 1.5 on macosx
Error: One factory fails for the operation "Mosaic"
Occurs in: javax.media.jai.ThreadSafeOperationRegistry
j
We are having slightly different conversations.
I indicated the WMS patch was ready; we can tag 2.7-M2 at any time (I
am also not aware of any show stoppers).
I don't know what our release schedule is, until we have an idea we
won't know when to release.
jody
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:04 AM, D
Hi Jody,
how is going on with the last fixes for 2.7-M2?
Please, note that is not a TAG request, but just a status request :)
Please, let me know.
Best Regards,
Daniele
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> On it.
>
> Jody
>
> On 12/07/2010, at 10:50 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>
On it.
Jody
On 12/07/2010, at 10:50 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
What is your time scheduling about the WMSLayer issue?
>>> I was going to look at it this evening. It is not so much an issue as
>>> something that is not done with respect to the MapContext refactoring l
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
What is your time scheduling about the WMSLayer issue?
>>> I was going to look at it this evening. It is not so much an issue as
>>> something that is not done with respect to the MapContext refactoring last
>>> month. Since it shows up in o
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> What is your time scheduling about the WMSLayer issue?
>> I was going to look at it this evening. It is not so much an issue as
>> something that is not done with respect to the MapContext refactoring last
>> month. Since it shows up in one of the tutorialsI am going
>> What is your time scheduling about the WMSLayer issue?
>
> I was going to look at it this evening. It is not so much an issue as
> something that is not done with respect to the MapContext refactoring last
> month. Since it shows up in one of the tutorialsI am going to try and fix it.
Done.
On 12/07/2010, at 8:10 PM, Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> I don't think we will actually include ImageIO-ext 1.1.x dependency on that
> Milestone. (We would like to do some more testings on it before.)
Agreed 1.1.x is not ready today. When do you think it would be ready - and does
your c
Hi Jody,
I don't think we will actually include ImageIO-ext 1.1.x dependency on that
Milestone. (We would like to do some more testings on it before.)
Latelly, Simone did some improvements and changes on the
gridCoverageReaders/mosaic modules which we would like to get available.
What is your time
Hi Again Daniele:
I would like to see a 2.7-M2 release made; I have one issue with WMSLayer that
I would like to fix up; I am not aware of any other interesting outstanding
issues.
In terms of having a road map can I ask why you are interested in having a
Milesone available? Specifically what
We don't have a roadmap my friend.
I have stopped planning until a few more facts come to the table.
Jody
On 10/07/2010, at 2:21 AM, Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
> Hi Jody.
> Just out of curiosity:
> do you think tagging the 2.7-M2 release sounds feasible for the beginning of
> the next week?
> If
Hi Jody.
Just out of curiosity:
do you think tagging the 2.7-M2 release sounds feasible for the beginning of
the next week?
If you need assistance, I can give you a hand since we are interested in
having a Milestone available.
Cheers,
Daniele
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wr
On 03/07/10 16:53, Jody Garnett wrote:
> As such can I request a 2.7-M2 release.
+1 for me.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
-
On 03/07/2010, at 7:26 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Okay let me try this again; it seems that there is a fair amount of
>> development slated for the 2.7 series that I was not aware of; and a release
>> candidate is premature. I would still like to tag up a milestone rele
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Okay let me try this again; it seems that there is a fair amount of
> development slated for the 2.7 series that I was not aware of; and a release
> candidate is premature. I would still like to tag up a milestone release at
> this time.
>
> As such can I request a 2.
Okay let me try this again; it seems that there is a fair amount of development
slated for the 2.7 series that I was not aware of; and a release candidate is
premature. I would still like to tag up a milestone release at this time.
As such can I request a 2.7-M2 release.
It will probably take m
16 matches
Mail list logo
