Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Michael Bedward
Yes, it builds without problem on my local machine too now. Thanks for this cleanup Simone - a big improvement ! Michael On 11 January 2011 17:45, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Michael, > forgotten commit. > Everything seems fine now. > > Simone. > --

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Michael, forgotten commit. Everything seems fine now. Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584962313 fax:      +39 0584962313 mob:    +39 333 812

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Michael Bedward
The problem appeared to be just a left-over import statement. I've kicked the build server. Fingers crossed again... On 11 January 2011 12:19, Michael Bedward wrote: > Bummer - build fails in jpk2 module.  Checking that out now... > > On 11 January 2011 11:09, Simone Giannecchini > wrote: >> cro

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Michael Bedward
Bummer - build fails in jpk2 module. Checking that out now... On 11 January 2011 11:09, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > crossing fingers, firing the commit! > > Simone. > --- > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Founder > > Via Poggi

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
crossing fingers, firing the commit! Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584962313 fax:      +39 0584962313 mob:    +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Michael Bedward
++1 Simone :) Michael On 11 January 2011 09:42, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Jody, > thanks for checking the patches. > I would wait a bit in order to gather feedback from others, possibly michael > :) > > Simone. > --- > Ing. Simone Gian

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Jody, thanks for checking the patches. I would wait a bit in order to gather feedback from others, possibly michael :) Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Italy p

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Sounds good on this end. Jody On 11/01/2011, at 1:34 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Jody, > I have worked on removing the unneeded interfaces from the opengis > coverage package and subpackages. > I have also remove all those thousand of deprecated methods we had in > coverage subclasses.

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Christian I did remove a couple as I made the change over; if you spot any others that are not legitimate please correct as you find them. Jody On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, wrote: > +1, I can remember the deprecations caused a lot of confusion to me. > > @Jody, +1 for remove any deprecation

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-07 Thread christian . mueller
+1, I can remember the deprecations caused a lot of confusion to me. @Jody, +1 for remove any deprecations, as far as possible. Christian Quoting Simone Giannecchini : > Dear All, > now that we have finally takencontrol over our interfaces I would like > to ask your opinion about two things:

Re: [Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Ha ha; Simone you have exactly anticipated an email I was going to right. Basically I want to remove any deprecations; and if you can spot anything we don't implement please let me know (I may of missed some). So +1 for removing deprecations now; especially deprecation of Format and friends. Jo

[Geotools-devel] About coverage interfaces in geoapi

2011-01-07 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Dear All, now that we have finally takencontrol over our interfaces I would like to ask your opinion about two things: - 1 - The coverage API has been deprecated a long time ago withouth having a valid alternative. I would propose to UN-deprecated them right away. - 2 - We have a ton of coverage