Re: [Geotools-devel] Checking on GeoTools License Compatibility

2009-01-06 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Jody, I think we'd have to approach Vivid Solutions to get any part of OpenJUMP released via LGPL. Based on my previous interactions with Vivid I'm not sure if this would be possible. But I could check with one of the guys from Vivid about the possibility. I should probably run this by the OJ dev

Re: [Geotools-devel] Checking on GeoTools License Compatibility

2008-12-31 Thread Jody Garnett
We have thought through similar problems with respect to GeoServer (which is also GPL) and come to the conclusion that the plugin API could be made LGPL if needed without putting any the high value services (ie WFS and WMS) in danger of being co-opted. Perhaps OpenJump could consider a similar

Re: [Geotools-devel] Checking on GeoTools License Compatibility

2008-12-30 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I was afraid that might be the case. I've got the JUMP API as a dependency because I included a plug-in for OpenJUMP as part of the module. I'll have to package this code separately, and release it under the GPL as I suspected. Thanks for the clarification. Landon On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:54 PM

Re: [Geotools-devel] Checking on GeoTools License Compatibility

2008-12-30 Thread Johann Sorel
Sunburned Surveyor a écrit : > I realize now that I should have checked on license compatibility > BEFORE introducing a dependency in my module, but hind sight is 20/20. > > Here are the libraries I'm using for the GPX2 module and their > respective licenses: > > Joda: Apache License Version 2.0 >

[Geotools-devel] Checking on GeoTools License Compatibility

2008-12-30 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I realize now that I should have checked on license compatibility BEFORE introducing a dependency in my module, but hind sight is 20/20. Here are the libraries I'm using for the GPX2 module and their respective licenses: Joda: Apache License Version 2.0 JDOM: Apache Style License with acknowledge