Re: [Geotools-devel] DataAccess review, me too :-)

2006-12-13 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Thanks for the feedback Andrea: > > Just going to try and sum up where we got to (so I can think about it > offline). > > -"go further" with description, that is describe what "xpath" > expressions would be valid. > > Q: Would something similar to command completion

Re: [Geotools-devel] DataAccess review, me too :-)

2006-12-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks for the feedback Andrea: Just going to try and sum up where we got to (so I can think about it offline). -"go further" with description, that is describe what "xpath" expressions would be valid. Q: Would something similar to command completion work? Ie given an xpath expression list th

Re: [Geotools-devel] DataAccess review, me too :-)

2006-12-13 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: (hi Gabriel, something for you too hidden in this discussion). > Hi Andrea, sorry my coding time is falling behind your feedback! >> The touted benefits of this are, apparently, that it makes it easier >> to link whatever data you have already in your application, and that

Re: [Geotools-devel] DataAccess review, me too :-)

2006-12-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Andrea, sorry my coding time is falling behind your feedback! I just need to make sure that working through the DataAccess api does not get lost in these discussions about process. > As I see, you want to provide data in its native format, assuming > that you can build appropriate property acc

Re: [Geotools-devel] DataAccess review

2006-12-12 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Why, instead of simply returning a useless "Object", can't we return >>> something that implements an interfaces that _looks like_ Feature type? >>> Maybe something that can list all "simple" properties around, those that >>> geotools is able

Re: [Geotools-devel] DataAccess review

2006-12-12 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Thanks for the detailed feedback Andrea going to try to field these > quickly before my workday... >> DataAccess >> - >> >> The interface does not say anything about being able to provide >> read only or read write accessors. I see that there's a Store >>

[Geotools-devel] DataAccess review

2006-12-12 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks for the detailed feedback Andrea going to try to field these quickly before my workday... > DataAccess > - > > The interface does not say anything about being able to provide > read only or read write accessors. I see that there's a Store > interface that extends Source, but