On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> I replied to this post:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg20713.html
>
> I started to use geotools from few days so maybe there's a good reason
> for this behaviour..
>
> Is it sufficient to do this
I replied to this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg20713.html
I started to use geotools from few days so maybe there's a good reason
for this behaviour..
Is it sufficient to do this in the private String fieldString(Object
obj, final int col) method?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> +1. I think that null dates must be definitely handled! Any reply to this
> topic?
I don't see the original message you're referring to in my local mail,
but as usual,
the standard replay is "patches welcomed, the source code is there
+1. I think that null dates must be definitely handled! Any reply to this topic?
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
List,
A little question: Why are some null objects written as a not NULL object?
A Date object with value 'null' is set to 'new Date()' and a Integer (or
Number) with value 'null' is set to 'new Integer(0)'.
Why not set the 'null' values to a empty string?
..
private String fieldString(O
