Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Hey Chris,
>
> I'm in Switzerland discovering their keyboard layout while trying to
> separate out the belgian layout from mz fingers so bear with me.
>
> The return to docbook was because:
> 1) we can't generate coherent pdf's w/ confluence
> 2) real doc writing (not
Hey Chris,
I'm in Switzerland discovering their keyboard layout while trying to
separate out the belgian layout from mz fingers so bear with me.
The return to docbook was because:
1) we can't generate coherent pdf's w/ confluence
2) real doc writing (not snippets) requires heavy cycles of edit
re
Jody Garnett wrote:
Chris Holmes wrote:
First off I apologize for not fully reading this thread, I've been on
vacation and there's just a pile of email waiting. If this question
has been resolved just point me at the relevant discussions.
But _why_ are we reverting back to docbook? A few
Chris Holmes wrote:
> First off I apologize for not fully reading this thread, I've been on
> vacation and there's just a pile of email waiting. If this question
> has been resolved just point me at the relevant discussions.
>
> But _why_ are we reverting back to docbook? A few years ago we mov
Chris Holmes ha scritto:
>> Ho hum,
>> I don't know what the others think, I can give you just my motivations
>> on why I provided my +1.
>>
>> First off, I keep on loosing my edits when I work with wiki. Edit,
>> preview,
>> back, forward, boom! And my edit is lost (ok, that's my fault, I'm too
Andrea Aime wrote:
Chris Holmes ha scritto:
First off I apologize for not fully reading this thread, I've been on
vacation and there's just a pile of email waiting. If this question
has been resolved just point me at the relevant discussions.
But _why_ are we reverting back to docbook? A
Chris Holmes ha scritto:
> First off I apologize for not fully reading this thread, I've been on
> vacation and there's just a pile of email waiting. If this question has
> been resolved just point me at the relevant discussions.
>
> But _why_ are we reverting back to docbook? A few years ago
First off I apologize for not fully reading this thread, I've been on
vacation and there's just a pile of email waiting. If this question has
been resolved just point me at the relevant discussions.
But _why_ are we reverting back to docbook? A few years ago we moved to
wiki to get _away_ fr
I have updated the config file attached to the Subversion page.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Subversion
Richard
On Tue, 2006-22-08 at 18:17 +0200, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Adrian Custer a écrit :
> > I've committed the skeleton of the docbook doc into gt/doc/C/. There's a
> > 00_Rea
Adrian Custer a écrit :
I've committed the skeleton of the docbook doc into gt/doc/C/. There's a
00_Readme.text file that shows how I'm using docbook. There are two
printed manuals in gt/doc/C/output/. geotools.ps is the output generated
by yelp that shows how an elegant .xsl transform should beh
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 13:01 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Can you do a geotools.ps.pdf, that is, convert the ps into pdf?
done.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Hey all,
>
> I've committed the skeleton of the docbook doc into gt/doc/C/. There's a
> 00_Readme.text file that shows how I'm using docbook. There are two
> printed manuals in gt/doc/C/output/. geotools.ps is the output generated
> by yelp that shows how an elegant .x
Hey all,
I've committed the skeleton of the docbook doc into gt/doc/C/. There's a
00_Readme.text file that shows how I'm using docbook. There are two
printed manuals in gt/doc/C/output/. geotools.ps is the output generated
by yelp that shows how an elegant .xsl transform should behave.
geotools.p
13 matches
Mail list logo
