Hi Martin,
>
>Just to make sure that I get the big picture right, could you confirm me
>that in the current state, invoking
>
> ProjectedCRS.getBaseToCRS().getMathTransform().toWKT()
>
>on the CRS you created gives you a CONCAT_MT with 2 transforms, the first
>one containing a few elements like
Jan Jezek a écrit :
> how is it possible to reach the goal that the .toWKT() will return the string
> including new parameters but just in case that such parameters were
> explicitly specified without changing the
> Projection as such?
Just to make sure that I get the big picture right, could
gards,
Jan.
__
> Od: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Komu: Jan Jezek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: geotools-devel , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: 26.08.2008 16:06
> Předmět: Re: [Geotools-devel] ESRI Axis definition issue
>
>Jan
Jan Jezek a écrit :
> According to question in users list (below) - I would like to fix the Krovak
> projection to be compatible with ESRI definition. Problem is that ESRI
> definition is solving the axis swapping by defining the X_scale, Y_Scale and
> XY_Plane_Rotation parameters like this:
>
Hi all,
According to question in users list (below) - I would like to fix the Krovak
projection to be compatible with ESRI definition. Problem is that ESRI
definition is solving the axis swapping by defining the X_scale, Y_Scale and
XY_Plane_Rotation parameters like this:
PARAMETER["X_Scale",-
