Just to close out this thread, the software grant was received and the PR
should be good to go.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 22:05, sjudeng wrote:
> Jody,
>
> I think the Software Grant should be all set. Does that mean we no longer
> need to wait for CLA signatures from the other cont
Jody,
I think the Software Grant should be all set. Does that mean we no longer
need to wait for CLA signatures from the other contributors? Can review of
the PR move forward now? https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/2749
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 1:43 AM Jody Garnett wrote:
> That document
That document can be used two ways:
a) let an organization list several employees as working on their behalf;
b) donate some code (which you could name) in bulk
If you wanted to package up some code (a mix of your own work and public
domain work) and donate it to OSGeo you could do so. The docume
Jody,
Thanks again for the detail in the other thread on this. It sounds like
there's a good path forward and it might be close, which is great news. A
couple questions are below to help me better understand what you had in
mind. I apologize I can't readily make one of the bi-weekly GeoServer
meet
Hi Jody,
I am not a government employee or contractor and I don't have insight into
whether or how the CLA issue involving the government contractor
contributor might be resolved. I think it's reasonable to assume that it is
not something that will be addressed in the foreseeable future.
Is the r
You can email a PDF, and many programs let you sign a PDF.
For us government often the work is often public domain, so can be picked
up and contributed by an individual side stepping many of these issues.
We have some history of trying to untangle use of CLAs between NGA and
OSGeo, and NGA and Ec
Hi,
on the geoserver-devel mailing list we are discussing limited ways to
contribute self-contained modules
without having to sign a CLA. I'd invite you to participate to that
discussion, if it gets approved there,
we could propose the same in GeoTools. Of particular interest would be, why
are you
Jody and Andrea,
Just to update on this, I did reach out to ElasticGeo contributors. I think
some will be able to sign and are just slowed by the current print/scan
process to submit. Others I am still awaiting a response from. In at least
one case I don't think the CLA will be signed as the work
Hello again,
I reached out to ElasticGeo contributors regarding CLA signing and in the
meantime have opened a PR with the contribution to GeoTools. I'll keep an
eye on the CI build and work through any issues that come up.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/2749
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:11 AM sjudeng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If there is interest I'd like to try again to get ElasticGeo contributed
> to GeoTools/GeoServer as a community module.
>
I don't remember about previous attempts... but you're welcomed to donate
the module indeed, it's a good move!
Is
We would like everyone to have a CLA signed.
The OSGeo CLA gives the geotools project management committee a few more
protections and abilities beyond the LGPL license. Most notably it allows
us to donate the code to other open source projects (something we have done
both for GeoToolKit and JTS To
Hi all,
If there is interest I'd like to try again to get ElasticGeo contributed to
GeoTools/GeoServer as a community module. All of my contributes are covered
under my OSGeo ICLA and I have an initial cut at the rebase (see below).
But there have been other contributors over the years. Would ever
12 matches
Mail list logo
