Adrian Custer wrote:
> Meanwhile, a new question along the same lines: why are the various
> interfaces declaring getBounds() as returning the 2D BoundingBox rather
> than the completely general Envelope? Is this an oversight or are you
> really intending to facilitate the 2D case at the expense of
Hey Gabriel, Justin,
Thanks for the response. I am definitely expecting to have to write a
GtGeometryAttributeImpl once I figure out better what is going on. I'm
also hoping to be able to extract those properties from the features
without actually getting and building the features. It seems there
Hi Adrian,
hmm... that looks like a plain svn copy from the old fm branch and would
certainly be more accurately documented with no comments at all.. sad.
I'm cc'ing Justin since he may know better of the (in)completeness of the
FeatureImpl porting to trunk, I guess those classes were included j
Hey Gabriel, All,
Can you give us an update on the status of the Feature model and how you
are expecting it to change over the next six months?
I'm just now turning to look at how we could integrate a new geometry
model into your feature model. Unfortunately, the first javadoc I run
into, Featur
