On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> And here we go with a pull request:
>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/469
>>
>
> Bah, I'm losing it... I did implement the version using @KVP.
> Pull request now updated to u
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> And here we go with a pull request:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/469
>
Bah, I'm losing it... I did implement the version using @KVP.
Pull request now updated to use simple strings as in the second example
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
And here we go with a pull request:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/469
Cheers
Andrea
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>>
>> So is meta taking a list of strings, each string parsed as a key value
pai
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
>
> So is meta taking a list of strings, each string parsed as a key value
>>> pair? sounds okay.
>>>
>>
>> Right, it would be split at the first = and added into the metadata map
>>
>
> Sounds good, assume this more legible then just alternat
> So is meta taking a list of strings, each string parsed as a key value
>> pair? sounds okay.
>>
>
> Right, it would be split at the first = and added into the metadata map
>
Sounds good, assume this more legible then just alternating key, value
pairs:
meta = {"mimeTypes","application/json,tex
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Andrea Aime <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> in this mail I'm proposing that we extend the parameter and result process
>> annotation with a meta key that would allow the specification of
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> in this mail I'm proposing that we extend the parameter and result process
> annotation with a meta key that would allow the specification of extra
> metadata meant to be added in the Param metadata map.
>
Good idea, goal was to have t
Hi,
in this mail I'm proposing that we extend the parameter and result process
annotation with a meta key that would allow the specification of extra
metadata meant to be added in the Param metadata map.
The following example is geared towards specifying a mimeTypes
and a selection entries in the