>> Which class is deprecated? The deprecation was removed as far as I know
>> (it was added when I thought the Feature Model was
>> straightened out for GeoTools 2.1, but I could not make sense of the
>> alternative so the deprecation should of been removed).
>>
> ==> The deprecation is in
Thanks for the clarifications jody.
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 11:05 +0200, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Adrian Custer wrote:
> > The approach seems to have two branches, via FeatureTypeFactory
> > or via FeatureTypeBuilder but neither seems complete.
> >
> > AttributeTypeFa
Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Making Features is a mess in 2.2.x ; I'd like to resolve this.
>
>
> >From the Javadocs, both GeoAPI and Geotools appear to provide approaches
> to building Features but both are problematic.
>
> 1) Does the GeoAPI approach even work?
>
No - there is
Adrian Custer wrote:
> Thanks Andrea,
> FeatureTypes... did indeed clean up the deprecation.
>
> To everyone,
> We need to have a meta discussion about factories, not just for
> features but to bring the referencing factories inline and have a
> standard policy.
I have had this discussion, and
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Jody and I spent a lot of time coming up with this api on FM as andrea
> stated. In the process came up with some decent guidelines as to what a
> factory should do vs a builder.
>
> However with FM having no path to trunk this doesn't help us much.
Hum, can you
Jody and I spent a lot of time coming up with this api on FM as andrea
stated. In the process came up with some decent guidelines as to what a
factory should do vs a builder.
However with FM having no path to trunk this doesn't help us much. It
would be possible to port the feature factories +
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Thanks Andrea,
> FeatureTypes... did indeed clean up the deprecation.
>
>
Cool
> To everyone,
> We need to have a meta discussion about factories, not just for
> features but to bring the referencing factories inline and have a
> standard policy. THIS IS TRUE EVE
Thanks Andrea,
FeatureTypes... did indeed clean up the deprecation.
To everyone,
We need to have a meta discussion about factories, not just for
features but to bring the referencing factories inline and have a
standard policy. THIS IS TRUE EVEN IF THE ULTIMATE NIRVANA IS
CONTAINERS. We have
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Hey all,
>
> Making Features is a mess in 2.2.x ; I'd like to resolve this.
>
>
> >From the Javadocs, both GeoAPI and Geotools appear to provide approaches
> to building Features but both are problematic.
>
> 1) Does the GeoAPI approach even work?
> This
Hey all,
Making Features is a mess in 2.2.x ; I'd like to resolve this.
>From the Javadocs, both GeoAPI and Geotools appear to provide approaches
to building Features but both are problematic.
1) Does the GeoAPI approach even work?
This approach uses AttributeDescriptors, are t
10 matches
Mail list logo
