Re: [Geotools-devel] GML 3.2 support

2009-05-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Thanks, Justin, I'll see if it works. GeoSciML 2.0 sneaked in a GML 3.2 dependency, which makes GeoServer very unhappy, so GML 3.2 support would be very handy. Kind regards, Ben. Justin Deoliveira wrote: > A while back I implemented support for the GML 3.2 schema to help out > Rob. Other than

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML 3.2 support

2009-05-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
A while back I implemented support for the GML 3.2 schema to help out Rob. Other than some trivial examples I never really did any real testing. That said, all the setup is there, so ready for use. And yeah, the different namespace uri *should* prevent any conflicts. -Justin Ben Caradoc-Davies

[Geotools-devel] GML 3.2 support

2009-05-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin, is the GML 3.2 support in xsd-gml3 ready? As I understand it, because GML 3.2 has a separate namespace, we should be able to use it alongside 3.1. If you are happy with your implementation, I will try to use it. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration