johann sorel ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Work is in progress on the new GO implementation.
> Anyway the new implementation doesnt define anything for styles so if you
> fallow SLD or SE specification I have no objections.
This has nothing to do with SLD or SE. The SLD spec is turned into
a set of "r
Hello,
Work is in progress on the new GO implementation.
Anyway the new implementation doesnt define anything for styles so if you
fallow SLD or SE specification I have no objections.
Just take care to not depend on any interfaces from geoapi
"org.opengis.go" package.
The old "org.opengis.go" p
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Hum, Style2D was part of the old Renderer2D design, that predates
> the GO-1 stuff. Yet, I've seen that Johann committed some classes
> named Renderer2D so I thought there was a relationship between
> GO-1 and your old renderer.
Yes this is a refactoring of the old renderer
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Hello Andrea
>
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Since works are started again in the GO-1 implementation and as
>> far as I remember Style2D and SLDStyleFactory was used also by
>> Renderer2D, I would like to make sure this modification of mine
>> will not adversely af
Hello Andrea
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Since works are started again in the GO-1 implementation and as
> far as I remember Style2D and SLDStyleFactory was used also by
> Renderer2D, I would like to make sure this modification of mine
> will not adversely affect you.
Johan could confirm (he is the
Hi,
these days I'm playing a bit with the dynamic graphics object
proposal described here
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Dynamic+SLD+Graphic+objects
and whose implementation is tracked here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1823
Now, the last step in the implementation would be the
