I would like to get the word "complex" out of there; I would prefer to
use the word "feature" and make "simple feature" an optimization that
has to be talked about when applicable.
Does creating a "gt-feature" module sound okay to you?
Jody
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Gabriel and Jody,
>
> is d
Its not very appropriate... yes we need to support complex types, but its
really all about the stability of the contract between service and client.
Surely the JIRA should match the packaging in the code?
Rob a
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gab
Gabriel and Jody,
is data-complex the appropriate Jira component for community-schemas-ds
issues? Do you think it is suitably named, or should become
data-community-schemas?
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Australian Reso
