> Are you referring to:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/How+to+Find+a+Factory ?
Not even that nice :-)
A picture of how that "factory registery" stuff is used by the referencing
module to wire itself up.
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/Referencing+Developers+Guide
- http://
>> Where is (are) this code located?
>
> I think we will have to go look ... I would open up FactoryRegister and then
> look for references in the current workspace.
> There is a picture in the wiki but that is down for me right now.
Are you referring to:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/
> Where is (are) this code located?
I think we will have to go look ... I would open up FactoryRegister and then
look for references in the current workspace.
There is a picture in the wiki but that is down for me right now.
>> So perhaps:
>> - we could try generating additional entries for the
> Mathieu - one thing that may help is that we have all our GeoTools code
> using the same "factoryregistery" class to check factory spi (and to hold
> onto a singleton of each factory found). We have extended this factory
> registery in a few cases to allow people to "register" additional
> implem
> You had some experience with the "udig lite" effort that had bundled up
> some of geotools as OSGi plugins? I cannot really remember any of the
> details since I was not active at the time. Is there anything you can
> remember that may help us?
>
Sadly, despite my best intentions to try out the
Craig: (got it right that time - sigh)
You had some experience with the "udig lite" effort that had bundled up some of
geotools as OSGi plugins? I cannot really remember any of the details since I
was not active at the time. Is there anything you can remember that may help
us?
Mathieu - one t
Hi Mathieu, thanks for the intro Jody,
> Wanted to introduce you to Crag from the uDig project - who cheerfully
> asked me how geotools / osgi relationship was going. When he last checked in
> Harald was working on it (but as you saw on that page Harald left
> instructions and thus nothing has hap
I am trying to think of a subset; the truth of the matter is that the library
is plugin based and that FactorySPI is the plug-in system. Even "basics" like
data access or support of coordinate reference systems do not work with out a
couple key facilities that are found via plugins.
Suppose the
> I think we should do a few test on a small but consistent and
> representative subset of geotools modules which are using SPI (both
> geotools internal and from third parties)
>
> Which ones would you recommend?
Jody, could you recommend a small subset of modules using SPI?
I could maybe find so
> Wanted to introduce you to Crag from the uDig project - who cheerfully asked
> me how geotools / osgi relationship was going. When he last checked in Harald
> was working on it (but as you saw on that page Harald left instructions and
> thus nothing has happened).
Sorry, I'm kind of busy righ
Hi Mathieu:
Wanted to introduce you to Crag from the uDig project - who cheerfully asked me
how geotools / osgi relationship was going. When he last checked in Harald was
working on it (but as you saw on that page Harald left instructions and thus
nothing has happened).
I had kind of a basic /
Thanks!
Added you now; so you should be able to edit the wiki.
There is a page started here:
-
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Add+bundle+information+to+jar+manifest
But it never really had enough information for us to do anything.
Jody
On 09/06/2010, at 10:42 PM, Mathieu Baudier wr
> There is a page that goes through what you need to do:
> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Wiki+Signup
Ok, I did apply to join here:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/geotools
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekD
There is a page that goes through what you need to do:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Wiki+Signup
Because of the amount of vandalism the security steps are pretty tight and you
have a few more steps before you can edit.
Jody
On 09/06/2010, at 1:33 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> Are
> Are you set up for editing on the wiki?
I just registered to the codehaus wiki (under user 'mbaudier'), so I
guess that should be ok.
Although I did not find how to update this page:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/0+Where+do+I+find+the+Source+Code
(the SVN URL is obsolete and this is
Hi Mathieu:
I am going to have some time this week to go over your ideas and turn them into
a proposal. Are you set up for editing on the wiki? We had some trouble with
Jira being broken into and a lot of the passwords have been reset; so even if
you had access before you should check.
Jody
O
> Is the proposal going to ask that every module maintainer picks
> the dependencies only from the Spring repos, or otherwise dependencies
> that have the proper OSGI meta-files? What if we need a dependency
> that is not there, must we go and repack it with the proper informations
> and upload to
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Mathieu:
>
> I am going to try and turn your email into a proposal as I understand
> it. The proposal will need to have a couple of examples in it to
> explain to PMC members what it is we are planning to do. I was not
> aware of the progress made by the spring source
> I am going to try and turn your email into a proposal as I understand it. The
> proposal will need to have a couple of examples in it to explain to PMC
> members what it is we are planning to do. I was not aware of the progress
> made by the spring source maven repo - interesting.
examples =>
Hi Mathieu:
I am going to try and turn your email into a proposal as I understand it. The
proposal will need to have a couple of examples in it to explain to PMC members
what it is we are planning to do. I was not aware of the progress made by the
spring source maven repo - interesting.
I woul
Hello Jody,
I gave a first try to integrating the Maven Bundle Plugin with the
GeoTools build process.
It went pretty well and I could build all the jars with OSGi metadata
in their MANIFEST. (more details below)
This was the easy part and now the hard part is to see how we can have
a set of modu
> We were going to look at geotools and OSGi compatibility this month. It does
> look like my schedule is clearing up next week. Should we start discussion on
> Monday?
Yes, let's start next week.
Monday I'll be back at my desk in Vienna only around noon (CET), so
probably a bit late for you, bu
Hi Mathieu:
We were going to look at geotools and OSGi compatibility this month. It does
look like my schedule is clearing up next week. Should we start discussion on
Monday?
Jody
--
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
