Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Lack of consistency in GeoTools is, in my opinion, not the
> result of not following a spec, but the result of having multiple
> people work on different modules, in different times, without
> a central master mind to coordinate and decide each move.
Yes it is really exactl
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> I'm sorry that some topics has gone that emotional. This is true that
> figthing
> against complexity is a very hard topic - hacking GeoTools is a daily fight
> against entropy.
>
> On my side, the complexity in GeoTools that scare me the most is not the ISO
>
Hello,
Saying your question is naive is linguistically distinct from saying
you are naive. I've never met you so I could not possibly know if you
are or are not. Besides, I'm generally partial to the surveyors whose
paths I've had a chance to cross (or rod to carry) so I'd be inclined
to think hig
I'm sorry that some topics has gone that emotional. This is true that figthing
against complexity is a very hard topic - hacking GeoTools is a daily fight
against entropy.
On my side, the complexity in GeoTools that scare me the most is not the ISO
model complexity. While ISO models try to scop
Adrian,
Thank you for the detailed response, it seems that you, like other
GeoTools programmers, are willing to patiently answer my questions.
This is appreciated. I have some interleaved responses to your e-mail
below.
You wrote: "Your question seems totally naive."
I am a lot of things, but I
Hello,
Your question seems totally naive.
JTS is a good library but it should be obvious why it cannot form the
basis of a geometric engine for a geographic information system at
anything other than local scales. Using JTS has been a great first step
for Geotools since we've been able to focus o
