By inferring the threshold based on SampleDimension[] minimums, I really
just meant to use the minimum value as the threshold if its available, not
to compute it.
I did notice CoverageUtilities has a getMosaicThreshold() that seems to
attempt to ignore the threshold by setting it to data type mini
Hi Rich,
I think that inferring the threshold on the coverage could be slow (for
example for BigTiff data). In JAI-EXT we introduced the concept of NoData,
which will be used by the Mosaic operation instead of the old
threshold value.
Regards,
Nicola Lagomarsini.
2015-02-03 22:22 GMT+01:00 Rich
We've been using the geotools' resample operation to generally resize
rasters and have run into an issue. We have multiple bands with the double
data type and in the situation where the transform resolves to an identity
transform the resulting mosaic operation ends up masking some values. The
Res
