On 14/06/2010, at 1:31 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Correct; I would phrase it as. When true we assume that DMS entries
>> are understood to be represented as decimal degrees; this assumption
>> is shared by many applications but may not be correct for your
>> dataset. When false we carefully do not a
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> b) alternatively, add a flag to control the DMS/degree
>> behavior.
> I would prefer to add a flag; even if the default value is
> true.
Cool. Any reasoning behind the preference?
>>> Yeah; we are making an assumption - I
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> b) alternatively, add a flag to control the DMS/degree behavior.
I would prefer to add a flag; even if the default value is true.
>>> Cool. Any reasoning behind the preference?
>> Yeah; we are making an assumption - I would like the ability for users to
>> mak
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
b) alternatively, add a flag to control the DMS/degree behavior.
>>> I would prefer to add a flag; even if the default value is true.
>> Cool. Any reasoning behind the preference?
>
> Yeah; we are making an assumption - I would like the ability for users to
> make th
>>> b) alternatively, add a flag to control the DMS/degree behavior.
>> I would prefer to add a flag; even if the default value is true.
>
> Cool. Any reasoning behind the preference?
Yeah; we are making an assumption - I would like the ability for users to make
the assumption the other way if
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> On 13/06/2010, at 5:19 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> My guess is that anybody using a CRS with DMS unit is actually storing
>> the data in decimal deegrees, and that providing actual support for
>> the DMS unit transformation would just result in confused users.
>>
>> 2150
On 13/06/2010, at 5:19 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> My guess is that anybody using a CRS with DMS unit is actually storing
> the data in decimal deegrees, and that providing actual support for
> the DMS unit transformation would just result in confused users.
>
> 2150 is one of such codes, if I look
Hi,
there's an issue with the EPSG database that has been bothering
me for quite some time: the DMS unit.
The EPSG guidance defines the DMS unit as follow:
--
To allow coordinate operation parameter values given by their
infor
