Hi Jody,
> I thought one of the functions was done already...
Yep, the Categorize function was done by Johann and is passing basic
unit tests so, fingers crossed, there's not much to do there. The
Recode function should be pretty easy.
> That looks to be an amazing patch Michael; test cases; jav
I thought one of the functions was done already...
That looks to be an amazing patch Michael; test cases; javadocs etc. Wow;
between yourself and Andrea you are really raising the bar for GeoTools
participation.
Jody
On 06/05/2010, at 9:04 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Hi Andrea, Jody and all,
Hi Andrea, Jody and all,
I've just added an updated patch to the Jira issue for the Interpolate function
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3001
I think the patch includes all the minutiae of function behaviour that
we discussed back in March. It also includes an example,
InterpolationFunctionE
So very pretty!
Jody
On 24/03/2010, at 5:40 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> A bit of progress... Here is the countries shapefile with polygon
> fill interpolated from the population size attribute
>
> http://imagebin.org/90101
>
> Style created like this...
>
>private Style createInterpolate
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> A bit of progress... Here is the countries shapefile with polygon
> fill interpolated from the population size attribute
>
> http://imagebin.org/90101
Lovely! We could use this one as a replacement of the famous
GeoServer "USA population" map :-p
Cheers
Andrea
--
A bit of progress... Here is the countries shapefile with polygon
fill interpolated from the population size attribute
http://imagebin.org/90101
Style created like this...
private Style createInterpolatedStyle() {
Expression[] params = {
// lookup value is population siz
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> On 23 March 2010 13:59, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Could we just test with polygon fill for now? I won't have a chance to
>> checkout a branch to follow your work.
>
> No worries.
I like the "one step at a time" approach as well :-p
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGe
On 23 March 2010 13:59, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Could we just test with polygon fill for now? I won't have a chance to
> checkout a branch to follow your work.
No worries.
Michael
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Tr
Could we just test with polygon fill for now? I won't have a chance to
checkout a branch to follow your work.
I am actually hoping to release geotools 2.6.3 shortly; and the
interpolate function would make a great addition.
Jody
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> Hi Andr
Hi Andrea, Jody (and all),
I'm updating the function as discussed but before I do another patch I
wonder if it would be more convenient to create a branch for this work
? The reason I suggest it is that I've also mocked up an example of
using the Interpolate function in a raster colormap and have
Cool - I'll update the patch tomorrow.
Michael
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> On 22 March 2010 21:57, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Maybe by adding missing points outside of the specified range
>> to make the cubic algorithm work?
>> By the way I read the spec we can imagine repeating the first
>> and the last point indefinitely below and above what was
> "the LIE outside"
>
sigh...
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Pa
> The first and last points are added such that they like outside
or, as most people would say, "the LIE outside"
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
On 22 March 2010 21:57, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Maybe by adding missing points outside of the specified range
> to make the cubic algorithm work?
> By the way I read the spec we can imagine repeating the first
> and the last point indefinitely below and above what was
> specified without really changi
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm working on putting some flesh onto the bones of
> InterpolationFunction which have been sitting in the render module for
> some time (thanks Jody for pointing me to this).
>
> I've got the basics of linear, cosine and cubic interpolation working
> f
Yep, I've been reading their XML schema but it seems a bit odd.
Mode and Method appear to be defined the wrong way around: They have
mode referring to what I would think is more naturally termed the
interpolation method (linear, cosine or cubic) and method referring to
what seems more appropriatel
Hi Michael:
I think they are silent because according to their XML Schema those cases
cannot occur.
For our cases we probably want to throw an error (because the wrong number of
parameters was provided; unless you can think of a sensible solution?
You may also wish to read the XML Schema part o
The mangled sentence in that last message should have read...
4. . For cubic interpolation we need an interpolation point on either
side of the pair defining the interval that contains the lookup value:
Michael
--
Downlo
Hi folks,
I'm working on putting some flesh onto the bones of
InterpolationFunction which have been sitting in the render module for
some time (thanks Jody for pointing me to this).
I've got the basics of linear, cosine and cubic interpolation working
for numeric values. Next it's on to Color and
20 matches
Mail list logo
