Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
In response to the pirate attack - I have tried to organize things a bit
better:
- data geometryless - owned by RobA etc...
I think I missed this category. I'd like to find it so I can deep six that
swashbuckling freeloader of an issue (GEOT-564). I do like the way
categories are laid out, though!
Cool - yeah I made that category just for you (well and RobA of course).
It seems to me we got "geometry" being used for both JTS and ISO
Geometry, in both jira and confluence?
Ummm...when _I_ say "JTS geometry", I mean an ISO 19107 geometry
implementation backed by JTS. I do not mean creating another SFSQL
implementation. Is this what you mean as well?
I am not sure what is ment, I just hack Jira. I suspect that anything
to do with geometry will be dumped there - and if
it gets too crowded we can make a new space.
Note I normally call that "GML3 Geometry" but that just reflects my
use/need for it, aka the biz case that is driving us to consider it.
The problem we _are_ going to find is that we will probably want to support
more than one implementation of the 19107 GeoAPI interfaces. Martin and I
Sweet, well lets jump off that bridge when there is time need etc....
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
