Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 6 build safe again

2009-11-02 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > The win32 machine went down hard; as I understand it hosting the NTFS > file system was very processor intensive and an upgrade is required to > fix the problem. It may be faster to stand up a hudson build of your > own for a second opinion. Yup, we had to take it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 6 build safe again

2009-11-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Thanks Jody, much appreciated. (Definitely more appreciated than kicking app-schema out of the build.) Anyone know when the Java 6 continuous integration will be alive again? I think there was one for Win32: http://hudson.opengeo.org/win32/ Kind regards, Ben. On 31/10/09 13:17, Jody Garnett w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 6 build safe again

2009-11-01 Thread Jody Garnett
The win32 machine went down hard; as I understand it hosting the NTFS file system was very processor intensive and an upgrade is required to fix the problem. It may be faster to stand up a hudson build of your own for a second opinion. Jody On 02/11/2009, at 12:35 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies w

[Geotools-devel] Java 6 build safe again

2009-10-30 Thread Jody Garnett
I have "X"ed out some tests see (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2777) to make the build safe again for Java 6 developers. Jody -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only devel