David Blasby wrote:
Paul Ramsey wrote:
If so, how do I represent in XML?
Thats the problem -- in 2.2.1 Literal/Literal meant , now (2.2)
it means null.
You can test for null with PropertyIsNull, so the 2.2 implementation
is almost certainly wrong since there's no way to test for anymore.
I noticed this change.
I think this is the incorrect interpretation since there is a
PropertyIsNull test in Filter.
dave
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and
David Blasby wrote:
I noticed this change.
I think this is the incorrect interpretation since there is a
PropertyIsNull test in Filter.
I remember cory talking about this. Perhaps looking at the definition
of PropertyIsNull would help?
I imagine LiteralLiteral/ is the same thing as Literal/
If so, how do I represent in XML?
On Apr 4, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
David Blasby wrote:
I noticed this change.
I think this is the incorrect interpretation since there is a
PropertyIsNull test in Filter.
I remember cory talking about this. Perhaps looking at the
definition
