I would be happy to do it as well, however I think we need to get a
wider agreement that it is ok to kill FeatureResults#reader() first.
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>> Did we do "data"?
>>>
>> No I didn't I didn't know data was on the table. Looking at what would
>> need
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> Did we do "data"?
>>
> No I didn't I didn't know data was on the table. Looking at what would
> need to be done, there are a few wrinkles.
>
Darn it was done in FM and the bug number
- http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/fm/module/
- http://jira.codehaus.or
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> All done, xml and jdbc have been ripped out of main.
>>
> Did we do "data"?
No I didn't I didn't know data was on the table. Looking at what would
need to be done, there are a few wrinkles.
1. There is a dependency from the SLDPar
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> All done, xml and jdbc have been ripped out of main.
>
Did we do "data"?
> One notable thing I had to do to make it work as remove all the
> dependencies from the feature model on the GMLSchema class.
>
That makes sense.
> The dependency was in setting t
Done and done.
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>> All done, xml and jdbc have been ripped out of main.
>
> Thanks Justin :).
>
> Would you like to assign http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-983 to yourself
> and close it?
>
> Martin
>
>
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> All done, xml and jdbc have been ripped out of main.
Thanks Justin :).
Would you like to assign http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-983 to yourself
and close it?
Martin
-
Using Tomcat
Hi all,
All done, xml and jdbc have been ripped out of main.
One notable thing I had to do to make it work as remove all the
dependencies from the feature model on the GMLSchema class.
The dependency was in setting the namespace of a feature type when one
is not specified. Some of the type build
