Re: [Geotools-devel] Matrix branch merged without pull request and review

2015-05-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Revised pull request: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/836 -- Jody Garnett On 10 May 2015 at 07:06, Jody Garnett wrote: > I apologize for the misunderstanding, and am going over your feedback as > we speak. This was also a bit of a group effort with work being revised > based on publi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Matrix branch merged without pull request and review

2015-05-10 Thread Jody Garnett
I apologize for the misunderstanding, and am going over your feedback as we speak. This was also a bit of a group effort with work being revised based on public Jim's feedback, which caught earlier inconsistencies and mistakes. I will issue a pull request for the changes shortly. -- Jody Garne

Re: [Geotools-devel] Matrix branch merged without pull request and review

2015-05-10 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Sorry Andrea I thought your comments on the pull request and subsequent > email *was* a review :( > One commit to help the build going and a mail asking for help because GeoServer was not building hardly makes for a review... seems unlikely

Re: [Geotools-devel] Matrix branch merged without pull request and review

2015-05-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Sorry Andrea I thought your comments on the pull request and subsequent email *was* a review :( I squashed *some* of the commits (as Jim had some history to clean up). -- Jody Garnett On 10 May 2015 at 01:39, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've noticed the matrix branch has been merged on master a

[Geotools-devel] Matrix branch merged without pull request and review

2015-05-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I've noticed the matrix branch has been merged on master as is, without squashing commits, and without a review. That's rather uncommon (if not unique for something a proposal based set of changes), and I still believe a review is important, so I'm going to do one, please treat it as if it was