Apparently the archives can be slurped over to the new hardware as well.
Jody
Adrian Custer wrote:
> Jody Garnett wrote:
>> So we have three "votes" for moving the mailing list to osgeo
>> hardware. Talking to Paul it seems such a thing is possible/easy ...
>> so here is a formal motion. It cov
Jody Garnett wrote:
> So we have three "votes" for moving the mailing list to osgeo hardware.
> Talking to Paul it seems such a thing is possible/easy ... so here is a
> formal motion. It covers two things:
> 1. moving the mailing lists to osgeo hardware
> 2. changing the names so they are less c
Jody Garnett wrote:
> So we have three "votes" for moving the mailing list to osgeo hardware.
> Talking to Paul it seems such a thing is possible/easy ... so here is a
> formal motion. It covers two things:
> 1. moving the mailing lists to osgeo hardware
+1 from me.
> 2. changing the names so t
Jody, I gave you bad information about the lists addresses, they would
be @lists.osgeo.org, so:
geotools-de...@lists.osgeo.org
geotools-us...@lists.osgeo.org
geotools-comm...@lists.osgeo.org
Sorry,
Paul
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> So we have three "votes" for moving
So we have three "votes" for moving the mailing list to osgeo hardware.
Talking to Paul it seems such a thing is possible/easy ... so here is a
formal motion. It covers two things:
1. moving the mailing lists to osgeo hardware
2. changing the names so they are less consistent
geotools-devel@list
