I don't have a problem with the name change to GPX Base, or a Java
package structure that started with a prefix like
org.geotools.gpxbase.
I'm not sure about merging the modules though. They take two
approaches to two different problems. I believe the existing GeoTools
module is more tightly integ
I do not known GPX at all, but if the proposed module is at a lower level,
would
the following make sense?
* Call it "gpx-base" (or something like that) instead of "gpx2"
* Refactor "gpx" so that it use "gpx-base"
* Maybe (if the modules are small enough) consider merging them together?
GeoTools Programmers,
This is my formal request for permission to create an unsupported GPX2
module in GeoTools. GPX2 offers an alternative (not a replacement) of
the existing GPX code in GeoTools. The main difference is the purpose
of the library. The purpose of GPX2 is to provide "low-level" acc
