Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I was more meaning that I updated that page with your change in mind.
> Please review.
Looks good, did just some minor edits.
Aside... this style of coding:
if(...) {
...
}
else {
}
is afaik against the Java coding conventions, that do suggest this instead:
if(..
I was more meaning that I updated that page with your change in mind.
Please review.
Sphinx is not going to be used until we have a plan and a talk with
frank or Justin about deployment. Until then the wiki us our docs.
Jody
On 23/05/2010, at 6:22 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Wow that is a lot of work.
A lot of work? ... not really, the non bug fix patches I've been
committing recently were easily 5-10 times bigger.
Or you mean a lot of work on the user part?
> So you are needing to set the hint on a
> feature by feature basis - suspect we
Wow that is a lot of work. So you are needing to set the hint on a feature by
feature basis - suspect we have completely given up on Transaction for hint
purposes? You have not made an api change so committing to 2.6.x seems
reasonable. Proposals work best when you don't have an implementation r
Hi,
some time ago we started a discussion on how to support
the ability to insert a feature with FeatureStore.addFeatures
so that the feature id is used as is in the underlying
storage instead of being generated.
Today I cooked a little patch that enables the above
in all JDBC data stores and in
