Adrian Custer wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:40 -0800, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Please consider Eclesia's proposal to
>> be much more simple (and thus much
>> more likely to succeed).
>>
> Okay, then I have no comments really. If you are doing something tight
> t
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:40 -0800, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Jody Garnett wrote:
> Please consider Eclesia's proposal to
> be much more simple (and thus much
> more likely to succeed).
Okay, then I have no comments really. If you are doing something tight
that you understand, great. I thought I saw
Jody Garnett wrote:
>> 1) a good structure to hold multiple, labelled, selections on the
>> registry: e.g. an op gets to work against all the features of layer
>> one with height > 30 and all the features of layer two within some
>> bbox. I may be doing something "simple" like a buffer but want
Hi Adrian: On the process proposal page you left a comment that seems
incomplete (were some of your sentence chopped off?) - or at least
confusing to us...
>
> Hey all,
>
> As ever, Johann, that great slayer of Eclesia, nails a need of
> Geotools. Unfortunately, identifying the need is merely a
