Andrea Aime wrote:
> However, I'm not really sure it should be the developer to decide
> whether the server is under his control. It's usually
> only the maven user that knows.
> Say I want to setup unit testing against ArcSDE. The developer
> has full control over his own instance, he would like t
One remaining issue is whether we want to adopt a *FixtureTest
convention, like *OnlineTest and *StressTest, to allow developers to
recognise fixture tests and realise that they need to be enabled by
providing a fixture configuration file.
This opens up a larger discussion about whether the exi
I propose that the patch attached to GEOT-1951 be adopted on 2.4.x and
trunk:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1951
The patch (for 2.4.x) refactors OnlineTestCase into OnlineTestCase
(provides connection failure tolerance) and its superclass
FixtureTestCase (provides fixture handling). This
