Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal for updating the process API

2009-07-28 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Andrea, I just tried applying your patch to trunk which contains some of my recent additions. All went well with patching, build and tests :-) cheers Michael -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal for updating the process API

2009-07-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Hi Andrea: > > It has been a while since you first asked about this; my feedback is > to use Name (rather than a String) for consistency with everything > else; and to allow a bit of separation. A bit of separation == namespacing? I can go for that. I have to see how th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal for updating the process API

2009-07-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Andrea: It has been a while since you first asked about this; my feedback is to use Name (rather than a String) for consistency with everything else; and to allow a bit of separation. I would not worry about bridging the new design with the old; so far we have a udig community module and a geo

[Geotools-devel] Proposal for updating the process API

2009-07-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, as you know I've played a bit with hooking up Sextante with the GeoTools process API and stumbled into issues with the SPI and the one process per factory design: basically SPI pretends to register a class just once, so if you reuse the same factory over and over to register many Sextante proc