> Hi Jody,
>
> Sounds like it might be a lot of work ? I'd imagine there are too
> many fiddly cases in the code to be able to push it all through a
> shell script.
>
>
Having a look now - searching for "new ReferencedEnvelope" --> 630 matches.
I think I could do a search and replace for "new
I think with the different ReferencedEnvelope classes, it is best to use
a factory-like strategy to create envelopes rather than to call the
constructor directly. Makes sense.
On 12/04/2012 08:51 AM, Jody wrote:
Correct.
The alternative is to check the CRS yourself.
It is a pure factory meth
Correct.
The alternative is to check the CRS yourself.
It is a pure factory method in that respect.
--
Jody
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 5:11 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Jody Garnett (mailto:jody.garn.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Niels and myself were discussing what more can be done for
> ReferenceEnveloped3D integration in GeoTools.
>
> I have asked Niels to look over the javadocs, and add a code example to
> the user guide.
>
> The other thing we *could* do is go t
Hi Jody,
Sounds like it might be a lot of work ? I'd imagine there are too
many fiddly cases in the code to be able to push it all through a
shell script. But it would be nice for the sources to be consistent
with recommended usage which I assume is to use create() rather than
constructor.
Micha
Niels and myself were discussing what more can be done for ReferenceEnveloped3D
integration in GeoTools.
I have asked Niels to look over the javadocs, and add a code example to the
user guide.
The other thing we *could* do is go through the codebase and replace each
constructor call, with a c
