Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Acuster asked that we arrange the names so that alternatives show up
> together in javadocs (ie pay attention to sort order).
I would suggest to not use that as a criterion for choosing name. Me too I would
like to group alternative together, but this is more an issue with
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> I'm fine with the removal of Factory or replacement by something else.
>
>> Would any of the following be of interest to you: AbstractAuthority,
>> AbstractReferencingAuthority, ReferencingObjectBuilder,
>> ReferencingDefinitionAuthority. AbstractAuthority is the sho
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Okay understood ... I would like to remove the word Factory (as these
> classes are builders and are responsible for "definition" not creation).
I'm fine with the removal of Factory or replacement by something else.
> Would any of the following be of interest to you: Abst
Thanks Martin comments inline .. and I am updating the page to match (oh
I see you have too - thanks!).
> But I don't think that the following ones are improvements...
>
> * AbstractAuthorityFactory --> AbstractCRSAuthority
> * DirectAuthorityFactory --> DirectCRSAuthority
> Replacing "A
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Page has been updated with a table / comparison. Every time I write
> these descriptions they get shorter and more to the point.
>>
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Improve+CRSAuthority+Concurrency+Caching+and+Connection+Use
I agree with:
* "Stop calling ever
