Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>
>> can they subclass and annotate the subclass different?
>>
>
> I'm not sure on this one; Cédric would know better.
Hi,
it is normally possible to extend all classes and annotate only the sub
classes. The super class needs to have
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> can they subclass and annotate the subclass different?
I'm not sure on this one; Cédric would know better. But even if it is possible,
a user wanting to annotate differently would have to subclass the ~100 existing
classes. The cost would be close to the same than creati
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>
>> There is just one small technical glitch here; we would prevent them
>> placing JAXB annotations targeting a different (say applicatoin specific
>> schema).
>> We are in effect saying we like Filter 1.1 so much you cannot use this
>> ob
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> There is just one small technical glitch here; we would prevent them
> placing JAXB annotations targeting a different (say applicatoin specific
> schema).
> We are in effect saying we like Filter 1.1 so much you cannot use this
> object in your own xml schema for your ap
Hi Martin; I am listening.
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Okay, one last try to explain:
>
> * You objected that putting JAXB annotations would prevent usage of
> other annotations like Hibernete
> WRONG: Each annotations live in their own packages.
Agreed; let us move on.
> * You objected that
