Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hi all,
I am working on creating a new sql encoder for postgis based on geoapi
interfaces only. I would like to maintain all the behavior of the old
encoder as well. One thing I have come across that is puzzling me is
encoding of a "Disjoint" f
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I am working on creating a new sql encoder for postgis based on geoapi
> interfaces only. I would like to maintain all the behavior of the old
> encoder as well. One thing I have come across that is puzzling me is
> encoding of a "Disjoint" filter.
>
> Instead of calling
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on creating a new sql encoder for postgis based on geoapi
> interfaces only. I would like to maintain all the behavior of the old
> encoder as well. One thing I have come across that is puzzling me is
> encoding of a "Disjoint" filter.
>
>
Hi all,
I am working on creating a new sql encoder for postgis based on geoapi
interfaces only. I would like to maintain all the behavior of the old
encoder as well. One thing I have come across that is puzzling me is
encoding of a "Disjoint" filter.
Instead of calling the "Disjoint" postgis func
