Simone ha scritto:
> +1 about splitting but not too much :-).
>
> Ciao,
> Simone.
>
>
> Btw, Andrea I think we should report to the authorities about this use
> using LSD!
Well, I always had the impression that SLD and LSD were in fact related.
Not sure whether it's advisable to get some LSD b
nesday, March 07, 2007 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Splitting main further
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Andrea we originally gathered up filter, sld and so on *into* main.
>> Because users were having such a hard time sorting out what was needed
>> when.
>>
>&
Cory can we update the module page for SLD to include how you would like
to be contacted?
Jody
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> Look, what prompted me to suggest the split are GEOT-1165 and GEOT-1180.
>> A user is providing us good reports on LSD failures, patches with test
>> cases, and he's being i
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Look, what prompted me to suggest the split are GEOT-1165 and GEOT-1180.
> A user is providing us good reports on LSD failures, patches with test
> cases, and he's being ignored. Why? Because SLD is in no man's land,
> nobody feels compelled to evaluate and apply these patches.
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea we originally gathered up filter, sld and so on *into* main.
> Because users were having such a hard time sorting out what was needed
> when.
>
> I don't mind splitting things up; but I *do* wish that we could produce
> some larger artifacts rather then the fin
Andrea we originally gathered up filter, sld and so on *into* main.
Because users were having such a hard time sorting out what was needed when.
I don't mind splitting things up; but I *do* wish that we could produce
some larger artifacts rather then the fine grained approach scene for
the xml
+1. Having separate filter, sld, and gml module would give me a place to
put the xml bindings when it comes to getting them supported. Just
thinking... perhaps people will have a problem with that.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> just a thought of the top of my head: imho we should split gt2-main
Hi all,
just a thought of the top of my head: imho we should split gt2-main
further.
Rationale: main is a mix of various things, and it's no man's land
when it comes to mantainership (funny since this is the central
gt2 compontent, but as usual when the responsibility is shared between
too many p
Ok starting split
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>> Can I go ahead, or are there still some commits coming from you?
>
> Ready for going away. Sorry for the delay...
>
> For other developpers, I would suggest to wait a little bit before to come
> back
> to the "tr
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> Can I go ahead, or are there still some commits coming from you?
Ready for going away. Sorry for the delay...
For other developpers, I would suggest to wait a little bit before to come back
to the "trunk" pool...
Martin
Hi Martin,
Can I go ahead, or are there still some commits coming from you?
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit
11 matches
Mail list logo
