I kind of doubt it Jesse; I spent a couple days backporting the first
time - just because the Filters being produced use a different factory.
We need to let uDig 1.1 rest ...
Jody
Jesse Eichar wrote:
> Thanks Mauricio,
>
> I encountered a number of these issue when preparing for the Foss4G
> co
On Friday 17 October 2008 10:31:34 Jesse Eichar wrote:
> Thanks Mauricio,
>
> I encountered a number of these issue when preparing for the Foss4G
> conference. Do you think I could easily backport the work for use in
> uDig 1.1?
>
... udig 1.1 is working with geotools 2.2 but TXT is using
Thanks Mauricio,
I encountered a number of these issue when preparing for the Foss4G
conference. Do you think I could easily backport the work for use in
uDig 1.1?
Jesse
On 10-Oct-08, at 4:35 PM, Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 21:25:25 Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Could you
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 21:25:25 Jody Garnett wrote:
> Could you mention the new syntax on that page? for example I see "like
> spatial-relation predicate" listed under tasks but I am not sure I
> understand it.
>
> Jody
I have added a column to the task list with a link to the relevant secti
This all looks good; the only matter we are really voting on here is the
addition of a new class:
> class TXT {
> String toTXT( Expression );
> String toTXT( Filter );
> Expression toExpression( String );
> Expression toExpression( String, FilterFactory );
> Filter toFilter( St
Hello list, we are near to finish our TXT proposal called "Extension of CQL to
match abilities of Filter"
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter
In the inception phase we picked up the suggestions of a lot of people. Then
we were working to prov
Hello list, we are near to finish our TXT proposal called "Extension of CQL to
match abilities of Filter"
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter
In the inception phase we picked up the suggestions of a lot of people. Then
we were working to prov
