I don't have a strong opinion but I would say either of options 2 or 3.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
> > Looks good andrea; I am module maintainer on gt-opengis; so go ahead and
> commit when ready :-)
>
> Hi all,
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Looks good andrea; I am module maintainer on gt-opengis; so go ahead and
> commit when ready :-)
Hi all,
so I've just committed the patch on trunk.
I was wondering about back porting it to 2.7.x too. Options:
- back port now, this would re
Looks good andrea; I am module maintainer on gt-opengis; so go ahead and commit
when ready :-)
Jody
On 30/01/2011, at 5:02 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>> I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is
>> pretty
Perfect. Very nice.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
> > I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is
> > pretty small. I would just ask for a complete javadoc on the
> > VolatileFunction
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is
> pretty small. I would just ask for a complete javadoc on the
> VolatileFunction interface explaining its role.
Works for me. Let me try it out:
--
I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is
pretty small. I would just ask for a complete javadoc on the
VolatileFunction interface explaining its role.
2c.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Okay; let us get this one moving.
>
> I ambushed aaime on his weekend to see if this was slated for gt-api as a
> simple patch; or if it would go through the proposal process.
>
> My initial thought was that this should be handled in a simil
Okay; let us get this one moving.
I ambushed aaime on his weekend to see if this was slated for gt-api as a
simple patch; or if it would go through the proposal process.
My initial thought was that this should be handled in a similar fashion to the
other marker interface we have in there:
> pu
