I only can say for sure that the xxx_n functions where n corresponds to the
number of arguments is due to the Filter spec requiring a fixed number of
arguments for a given function name, so that's what David implemented.
Since it is generated we should ask David to get the function classes out a
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm wondering why we do have math expression implementations such
>> as FilterFunction_abs_2, FilterFunction_abs_3, FilterFunction_abs_4
>> and so
>> on, all with the same executable code. Seems silly, what's the purpose
>> of this?
>>
>
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm wondering why we do have math expression implementations such
> as FilterFunction_abs_2, FilterFunction_abs_3, FilterFunction_abs_4 and so
> on, all with the same executable code. Seems silly, what's the purpose of
> this?
>
> Plus, all this files say that the fi
Hi all,
I'm wondering why we do have math expression implementations such
as FilterFunction_abs_2, FilterFunction_abs_3, FilterFunction_abs_4 and so
on, all with the same executable code. Seems silly, what's the purpose of this?
Plus, all this files say that the filter is generated...
hum, ok, gen
