David Zwiers wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answers. I'll try to re-phrase questions 2 and 3.
>
> The IP Question was just put out because I have not read the Eclipse
> license in depth ... and was hoping someone else had, and would share a
> brief comparison (are we compatible?).
We should be.
Thanks for the clarification David, you bring up some great points.
On Tue, August 1, 2006 6:11 pm, David Zwiers wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answers. I'll try to re-phrase questions 2 and 3.
>
>
> The IP Question was just put out because I have not read the Eclipse
> license in depth ... and was
Thanks for the quick answers. I'll try to re-phrase questions 2 and 3.
The IP Question was just put out because I have not read the Eclipse license in depth ... and was hoping someone else had, and would share a brief comparison (are we compatible?).
The dependency issue was more at a higher l
On Tue, August 1, 2006 11:34 am, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> David Zwiers wrote:
>
>
>> The fourth question, is more todo with servlet containers. I don't know
>> a whole ton about ESM, so this may not be a concern ... but when we
>> have two simultanious executions threads (in a servlet) executing the
>
Hi David,
Great questions, answers inline.
On Tue, August 1, 2006 11:27 am, David Zwiers wrote:
> Justin, a couple questions here about ESM:
>
>
> - How does this affect download sizes of other client applications
> (GeoServer)
It drags a few of the emf libraries along so there will be an increa
David Zwiers wrote:
> The fourth question, is more todo with servlet containers. I don't know
> a whole ton about ESM, so this may not be a concern ... but when we have
> two simultanious executions threads (in a servlet) executing the same
> functionality, will the end user (Ex. Geoserver) nee
Justin, a couple questions here about ESM:
- How does this affect download sizes of other client applications (GeoServer)
- How does this affect the IP issues that have been ongoing?
- Is this a dependency Geotools should have?
- Is the library thread safe?
The third question is most impor
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some of you might be aware of the xml parsing work that has been going
> on over the last while. It was used last year as part of ows-3, and
> intended to be used this year in ows-4.
>
I am a bit concerned that you will need the FM before you are done ...
Hi David,
It is an alternative to whats there, biggest differnt is the use of the
eclipse schema modelling library (XSD). However the two technologies
accomplish the same goal.
The end goal for the time being is to support parsing filter 1.1 and
gml3. Not sure if this conflicts with any of jes
Hi all,
Some of you might be aware of the xml parsing work that has been going
on over the last while. It was used last year as part of ows-3, and
intended to be used this year in ows-4.
At the moment the code is off on a udig branch, i would like create a
new module ( or an ext ) for it on ge
10 matches
Mail list logo
